![]() |
||
|
Editorial
The Editorial Board Allan Kolski Horwitz, Siphiwe ka Ngwenya, Ike Mboneni Muila, Zachariah Rapola, Linda ka Ndlovu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result of our new Bill of Rights we enjoyed open political activity on a scale and with a scope that had never before existed in our tortured society. The Broederbond control of Afrikaner politics meant that even in that limited constituency there had not been free debate and decision making and despite the direct, revolutionary democracy practiced to a great degree by the broad Mass Democratic Movement, the clandestine nature of underground struggle forced many formations to live a double life. On the one hand there had been the outward transparency of mass public gatherings (of trade unions, civics, youth, women, cultural and sports groups, the UDF). They were highly accessible and open to scrutiny and robust debate and developed a culture of mandate and report back. On the other hand, parallel to, but intersecting, had fermented the secret, inner workings of the liberation parties – the ANC, SACP, PAC, MWT, AZAPO, to mention the biggest and most influential - whose activists/cadres were participating in the ‘open’ organizations, but were simultaneously working to advance the positions of their political parties. 1994 meant that these parties could emerge from the murk of the underground and practice a democracy that had no need for methods necessarily demanded of cells whose security concerns demanded centralization and secrecy. We could think aloud – dreams and nightmares could be brought to the surface in a South Africa, still in convulsion, but enormously relieved to have brought about the end of racist rule and the consequent opening up of life for many millions of people within our own borders, and generally in southern Africa - the civil wars in Mocambique and Angola could finally be addressed without Pretoria stoking their fires. Indeed, for the first time, all South Africans could enjoy a constructive relationship with the rest of Botsotso, conceived as a magazine of ‘contemporary South African culture’, hence concluded the agreement with NEW NATION with a sense of excitement. Poetry and fiction, as well as polemic touching on ‘food for the soul” as well as for the stomach, could find a substantial readership (at its height NEW NATION was read by some 75,000 people). Artists were invited to contribute work that challenged accepted and perceived wisdoms – in all areas, of all classes and culures; art that would explore our identities and traditions, and do so without inhibition – except with regard to crassness or the giving of gratuitous offence! It was also art that was encouraged to experiment and perfect itself technically. It is worth revisiting a paragraph in the editorial of that first edition (so as to both contextualize its emergence, as well as to have a measure with which to evaluate the changes that have taken place over the past ten years): “BOTSOTSO is independent and follows no specific political or aesthetic doctrine. The main criterion for publication of work is that it has integrity and worth as an expression of individual experience and of our society.” To demonstrate that, the edition carried work by Tatamkhulu Afrika, Seitlhamo Motsapi, Ike Mboneni Muila, Anna Varney, Nthuseng Phedi Thlobolo, Siphiwe ka Ngwenya, Peter Horn, Isabella Motadinyane and Alan Finlay – surely as fine a selection of our poetic voices as one could hope to find! There was also an article on “The Vexed Question of Language” by Kenyan academic, James Ogude, and a series of drawings by student artists at the Johannesburg Art Foundation as well as by David Koloane. Thereafter writers and artists from all over the country sent in material which filled the pages of the following eight editions. However, sadly, like most of the publications that had their roots in the Struggle period, NEW NATION was discontinued (ironically by its last owners, who also owned THE SOWETAN). And with the shutting off of this mass readership BOTSOTSO had to revaluate its position. In 1996 the challenge was met with the establishing of a collective to produce the magazine as a ‘stand alone’ publication, as well as for the publication of books - the first being WE JIVE LIKE THIS by the Botsotso Jesters. (A list of all titles published to date appears at the end of this journal). The combining of public arts funding with income from sales helped to maintain a momentum even as submissions of new and vital writing continued to flow in. As a result there is today a confidence that the financial base so necessary to sustain publishing and other activities like poetry performance has been consolidated. But, as importantly, in casting an eye over the material that has appeared in the 13 Botsotso editions as well as the 11 books, there is the realization that, in the absence of a well organized and coherent writers organization and non-profit publishing house (following the deaths of COSAW, COSAW Publishing and AWA through mismanagement, lack of accountability and incoherence) and the dormant nature of the Publishers Association of South Africa (PASA), independent collectives like Botsotso (and Timbila in Polokwane, Kotaz in Port Elizabeth, Dyehard Press in Gauteng and Deep South in Cape Town) bear a vital responsibility to provide a platform for new writing, particularly poetry and short fiction, that commercial publishers will seldom promote on account of their limited buying ‘market’. So welcome to Botsotso! Gova (come aboard!) to use Ike Mboneni Muila’s poetic greeting. Read and react, reflect then contribute! The opportunity to publish new work on a more regular basis exists in that we are introducing a website (see back page for more information). The 1950’s Website developed by Lynn Danzig
|
![]() |
|